Thursday, 2 July 2020

COVID-19 TESTING IS PURE INSANITY

.



The SENSITIVITY of the PCR-test is the number of people with COVID the test claims to accurately identify. The claimed sensitivity varies from about 70% to 90%, depending on the source. 70% sensitivity means that 7 out of 10 people who have COVID will be identified as 'positive' by the test.

The SPECIFICITY of the test is the percentage of people who DON'T have COVID who are accurately identified. The claimed specificity varies from about 95% to 99% accuracy. The very significant point to recognise here is that between one and five percent of testees who don't have the virus will test positive for COVID.

Taking a period in the UK (May 11-24th ) when the official estimated percentage of people with COVID was 0.24%, let us see how these figures play out if (this number doesn't affect % outcomes) 100,000 people were tested at that time.

0.24% of 100,000 people is 240 so at this time 240 people (of the 100,000) actually had COVID-19

HIGH ACCURACY
Taking the highest quoted accuracies (SENSITIVITY 90%, SPECIFICITY 99%)
We see that 0.9 x 240 = 216 would test positive, 24 would be missed (negative result).
Of the 99,760 who do not have COVID, 1% will test positive. That is about 997 people.

So that total number of positive tests is 216 + 997 = 1213 people identified as having COVID
1213/240 = 5.05 ...

THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE TEST RESULTS IS 5 TIMES THE NUMBER THAT "HAVE" THE VIRUS.

So, if you take the test and are identified as COVID positive there is, USING THEIR OWN BEST ESTIMATE, only a one-in-five chance that you are really 'infected' (AS YOU WILL HAVE JUST BEEN INFORMED).

Worth knowing, don't you think? Just as well there are all those "asymptomatic" COVID carriers out there to make sense of this pantomime. It is hard not to laugh. Are you starting to get an idea of the absolute bullsh*t we are dealing with here? 

LOW ACCURACY
Taking the lowest quoted accuracies (SENSITIVITY 70%, SPECIFICITY 95%)

There are still 240 people with COVID.
0.7 x 240 = 168 would test positive, 72 missed (negative result)
5% of negatives test positive, i.e. 0,05 x 99760 = 4988 positives

so, the total number of positive tests is 168 + 4988 = 5156 people identified as having COVID. 5156/240 = 21.5  !!! 

THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE TEST RESULTS IS MORE THAN 20 TIMES THE NUMBER THAT "HAVE" THE VIRUS.

Therefore, if "accuracy" is the minimum quoted, for a person who is told they have tested positive for COVID there is less than one chance in twenty that you are infected with the virus you have JUST BEEN INFORMED is in your body.

Whatever COVID actually is (there is zero proof for causation by virus) it is, given the above, fair to say that there is poor correlation between PCR test results and this world-altering pandemic/illness.

Assuming that any chest-infection-type-illness can currently be considered to be part of the COVID basket we might ask ourselves what kind of "test results" might we get if we used some other indicator of the illness rather than the PCR test, which fails so badly to do its job? 
What if people were not told what the test was, just that they'd had it and here is your COVID-positive or COVID- negative result? What if the secret test had been adjudged to be POSITIVE if a person was:

a) Wearing a red jumper? 
Well, the percentage of the total would be appropriately small. It might work on that level. It could turn out that the number of people with chest infections and the number wearing red jumpers are very similar. However, it is very unlikely they will be the same people, which is a shame given that it would produce excellent  local cause for lock-down in areas close to certain schools with a red uniform. However. Sadly. 
This COVID test would certainly FAIL.

b) Wearing a white shirt/top?
A much better idea. A much larger sample to work with and, given that most COVID hosts are asymptomatic, many more people in the community with chest infections will fall into the correct basket. If more than one in twenty white-toppers have chest infections this could be a winner and what is more (Golly Gee!) EVERYONE in hospital with a chest-infection will 'test' positive. They're all white-topped in there. 
This COVID test could be a WINNER!

c) Carrying or within arm's length of paper tissues?
Anyone who is found to be either carrying tissues in their pocket or in a bed with tissues at hand. The State could do stop-and-search testing. Show us what's in your pockets and we'll tell you if you've got COVID. This one would work perfectly because even if a positive testee is perfectly healthy they probably think they are ill. It works on every level ... in your house, on the street, in hospital. Outcomes will be fantastically accurate. Those who test positive will believe it every time. Those who test negative will know there's nothing wrong with them. The correlation will be almost perfect. Deaths ? Well, I mean ... what kind of  Flu victim walks around with a wheezy chest, a runny nose and NO TISSUES IN THEIR POCKET? Someone must tell Boris Johnson straight away. 
This COVID test is THE VERY BEST.

If ABSOLUTE NONSENSE can model an illness better than SCIENCE perhaps the public will begin to realise that this SO-CALLED-SCIENCE is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE.









Other Links:




.



Thursday, 4 June 2020

THE 1918 HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS THAT ACCEPTING VACCINATIONS WOULD BE SUICIDAL MADNESS

.




All the information we need is out there somewhere. It is just a matter of discovering it for ourselves, given that the mainstream media is not going to help us in any way. 
Anyone who has read Arthur Firstenberg's "The Invisible Rainbow" knows that EMF radiation was known to cause flu symptoms centuries before The Spanish Flu took hold in 1918. 
The experiments carried out by US military doctors between November 1918 and April 1919 demonstrated that this flu was NOT CONTAGIOUS in the normally understood meaning of the word (i.e. it could not be passed from person to person).

The 'first wave' of Spanish Flu (like COVID19, so far) was relatively innocuous. However, at the time a massive vaccination program was carried out on the public, particularly on those in the military.

As this book reports these young people were most likely to die during this real and terrible pandemic.

The point is that this is a story that should be known. We are repeating the same cycle. First we suffer a 'normal-to-slightly-severe' Flu (has COVID19 been provably more than that?) ... 

... but now what?

Are we going to submit to the mass vaccination program that our politicians have been (and still are) conditioning us to see as our only safe refuge from the COVID monster?

Will we be hit by a 'Second Wave'? ... well, almost certainly. 

This operation, for that's what it is, has not been for nothing.

The following excerpt shows us quite clearly that we would be literally MAD to allow our families to accept the coming vaccinations.

Let our answer be .... NO!

Here is the excerpt from 'Virus Mania':

https://www.outersite.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Virus-Mania55tt66.pdf)

Chapter 7

Failed Infection Attempts 

In order to be able to better assess the puzzling mass disease, an attempt to simulate infection was undertaken with volunteers in Boston in November 1918. These were 62 healthy sailors charged with delinquency and sent to prison. They had been promised a pardon under the condition that they take part in an experiment. 39 of them had not had influenza, so the theory was that they would be particularly susceptible to infection and illness. 
But the results proved nothing of the sort, as American scientific journalist Gina Kolata describes in her book Influenza: "Navy doctors collected the mucus from men who were desperately ill from the flu, gathering thick viscous secretions from their noses and throats. They sprayed mucus from flu patients into the noses….
…. "But not a single healthy man got sick."
A comparable experiment, carried out under much stricter conditions, took place in San Francisco, with 50 imprisoned sailors. But, once again, the results did not correspond with what the doctors had expected: "Scientists were stunned. If these healthy volunteers did not get infected with influenza despite doctors' best efforts to make them ill, then what was causing this disease? How, exactly, did people get the flu?"

Chapter 7 

"All the doctors and people who were living at the time of the 1918 Spanish Influenza epidemic say it was the most terrible disease the world has ever had. Strong men, hale and hearty, one day would be dead the next. The disease had the characteristics of the Black Death added to typhus, diphtheria, pneumonia, smallpox, paralysis and all the diseases the people had been vaccinated with immediately following World War 1. Practically the entire population had been injected/'seeded' with a dozen or more diseases-or toxic serums. When all those doctor-made diseases started breaking out all at once it was tragic. 
"That pandemic dragged on for two years, kept alive with the addition of more poison drugs administered by the doctors who tried to suppress the symptoms. As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the time. We knew from the health teachings of Graham, Trail, Tilden and others, that people cannot contaminate the body with poisons without causing disease. "When the flu was at its peak, all the stores were closed as well as the schools, businesses-even the hospital, as the doctors and nurses had been vaccinated too and were down with the flu. No one was on the streets. It was like a ghost town. We seemed to be the only family [that] didn't get the flu; so my parents went. from house to house doing what they could to look after the sick, as it was impossible to get a doctor then. 
If it were possible for germs, bacteria, virus, or bacilli to cause disease, they had plenty of opportunity to attack my parents when they were spending many hours a day in the sick rooms. But they didn't get the flu and they didn't bring any germs home to attack us children and cause anything. None of our family had the flu-not even a sniffle-and it was in the winter with deep snow on the ground. "When I see people cringe when someone near them sneezes or coughs, I wonder how long it will take them to find out that they can't catch it-whatever it is. 
The only way they can get a disease is to develop it themselves by wrong eating, drinking, smoking or doing some other things which cause internal poisoning and lowered vitality. All diseases are preventable and most of them are curable with the right methods, not known to medical doctors, and not all drugless doctors know them either. 
"It has been said that the 1918 flu epidemic killed 20 million people throughout the world. But, actually, the doctors killed them with their crude and deadly treatments and drugs. This is a harsh accusation but it is nevertheless true, judging by the success of the drugless doctors in comparison with that of the medical doctors. "While the medical men and medical hospitals were losing 33% of their flu cases, the non-medical hospitals such as Battle Creek, Kellogg and MacFadden's Health­Restorium were getting almost 100% healings with their water cure, baths, enemas, 230
When the epidemic reached its peak, theatres, restaurants, dance halls and sports facilities were closed. etc., fasting and certain other simple healing methods, followed by carefully worked out diets of natural foods. One health doctor didn't lose a patient in eight years. "If the medical doctors had been as advanced as the drugless doctors, there would not have been those 20 million deaths from the medical flu treatment. 

"There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they had been vaccinated against. One soldier who had returned from overseas in 1912 told me that the army hospitals were filled with cases of infantile paralysis [polio] and he wondered why grown men should have an infant disease.
 Now, we know that paralysis is a common after-effect of vaccine poisoning. Those at home didn't get the paralysis until after the world-wide vaccination campaign in 1918."
Author Anne Riley Hale alludes to all of the above factors in her 1935 book Medical Voodoo: "As every one knows, the world has never witnessed such an orgy of vaccination and inoculation of every description as was inflicted by army-camp doctors upon the soldiers of the [First] World War." 
Hale also observed that the "amazing disease and death toll among them occurred among 'the picked men of the nation'-supposedly the most robust, resistant class of all, who presumably brought to the service each a good pair of lungs, since they must have passed a rigid physical examination by competent medical men."
And yet, precisely these supermen with super-lungs were the ones who were dropping like flies from pulmonary tuberculosis. In this context, a report in the Idaho Observer  is also worth noting. It mentions a contemporary vaccination trial by one Dr. Rosenau, published in the Mayo Collected Papers of the world-renowned Mayo Clinic. According to this paper, the vaccinated guinea pigs primarily suffered severe damage in their lungs-a typical symptom of tuberculosis and of the Spanish flu.


.

Thursday, 14 May 2020

THE STORY OF INFLUENZA. AN IMPORTANT TALE TO TELL YOUR FRIENDS.

.

It is highly recommended that readers use the following uncontroversial, historical detail as a (rather bland and unobtrusive) instrument that just might wake up those who are still sleeping.



The word "influenza" originated in Italy. The first record of this strange and inexplicable illness  occurred around the year 1580. As the phenomenon recurred, acute observers recognised that it tended to 'pop up' simultaneously in multiple locations, sometimes on multiple continents. In an effort to explain this cognitively dissonant fact, Italian 'scientists' examined sun-spot records and noticed that outbreaks always seemed to coincide with peaks of sun-spot activity.

They understood that when the sun's surface (or CORONA) was most active, there were mass-ejections from the sun that manifested as spectacular displays of the Aurora Borealis in northern climes and that there were also magnetic effects (or magnetic 'waves') from the sun that struck the earth with uncommon intensity at these times.

Thus the word "INFLUENZA became the name of this illness. "Influenza" being short for "Influenza delle stelle" ...  INFLUENCE OF THE STARS.

So, by the early 1600s European scientists had worked out that the cause of the illness now known as 'influenza' was the effect of unusual magnetic waves impacting the human body.

This "flu" narrative was accepted throughout the 1700s and 1800s. There were multiple references to the illnesses brought on by the proliferation of telegraph communications and the installation of AC power grids in US cities. Some of the reported effects were very serious for the persons involved, listlessness, loss of energy, depression, headaches and much more*.

The 'electric/magnetic' causation narrative continued as a model for explaining 'flu' symptoms right up until about 1920 and the global catastrophe of 1918/19 that was 'The Spanish Flu'.

THE SPANISH FLU

Again, this illness spread so fast that scientists could not explain the rate of contagion by human-to-human transfer of particles but it was the SECOND WAVE of Spanish Flu that killed tens of millions of people right across the world.

The US Surgeon General ordered a series of investigations into the nature of this disastrous contagion. One such series of experiments were conducted using 100 healthy volunteers from the US Navy by bringing them into close, controlled contact with patients suffering from the illness. A number of tests were repeatedly performed. Blood was extracted from the sick and injected into the volunteers. Patients spat into trays and the uninfected drank their sputum. Patients sneezed and coughed while volunteers, nose-to-nose, inhaled the droplets ejected as deeply as they could.

Doctors found, to the amazement of many, that NONE OF THE VOLUNTEERS GOT SICK. 

This 'Influenza' COULD NOT BE TRANSFERRED FROM ONE PERSON TO ANOTHER.

IT WAS NOT CONTAGIOUS.

Many scientists and thinkers of the day, such as Rudolf Steiner, declared that the apparent "contagion" was the result of simultaneous exposure to the new RADIO WAVES (electro-magnetic frequencies) that were being broadcast for the first time across almost the entire world.

Given that 50 million died, ELECTRICITY AS POTENTIAL CAUSE OF DEATH was not an idea that our finance rulers could allow the public at large to believe. This awareness was excluded from the public domain and the false 'virus' narrative was invented to explain 'the flu'.

If the public had been allowed to think that electrical installations and the radiation thereof might KILL them, then the entire 20th Century couldn't have happened. All plans for development, industrialisation and corporate profits involved electricity. The establishment needed another story.

They got it. The 'virus' narrative exactly mirrors the 'new EMF' narrative of causation of influenza. 

A virus keeps mutating. Our bodies adjust to the old virus/emf frequency and we are then OK until a new mutation/new frequency comes along.

People should be aware that:

1) As German New Medicine has been asserting since the 1980s, no virus has ever been isolated or purified from human tissue .... though it is easy to do this with viruses found on algae, for instance. GNM says that the 'virus model' for disease is fictional nonsense. Having read two of GNM's publications on this subject, it is impossible to disagree.

2) 'Electrical' diseases (like influenza) appear to affect some individuals very badly and others hardly at all.
During the Spanish Flu it was noticed that the worst symptoms occurred in young, healthy people between the ages of about 20 and 35. They often did not die, but they suffered the most. I noticed this same phenomenon during the recent period of the COVID flus. Young adults got it worst. It was they who lost their senses of taste and smell, for instance, and were laid up in bed with fevers. 
In the early 1920s there is a record of a doctor writing a newspaper column wondering publicly if his advice to patients to "keep themselves healthy" might be bad advice given that being healthy made you most vulnerable to extreme suffering during this illness.

3) The fact that some were not vulnerable to the flu (did anyone notice during this year's so-called-pandemic that one person in a family could fall hard to the illness whilst a sibling or parent in the same house did not catch it at all?) ... this allowed the powerful, using Sigmund Freud as a mouthpiece, to declare that because only some were affected, then all claims of "electrical ailments" have purely psychological causes. They are illnesses of the imagination, hypnotically self-induced ... they have no basis in physical reality.


.... and here we are today, collectively acting as though proximity to our neighbour might place us in mortal peril.

There is no debate re the good sense of this approach (even if such contagion was reality, this strategy for dealing with the illness is stupid). There is zero debate allowed regarding possible EMF causation to the recent pandemic.

... even though many experts, including Barry Trower, have clearly described the terrible dangers of the new system being constructed around us as we speak.
... even though we know that frequencies and intensities broadcast from the new masts are computer-controlled and we can be zapped by whatever chosen frequencies or intensities our rulers choose to use. The phone companies have completed their research on the effects of the broadcast signals but they refuse to share the data they have gleaned from experiments. 

The very mention of new generation mobile phone masts is forbidden in the public domain. Until this vital issue is freely and fairly debated we must reserve the right to believe that we are being lied to about everything, that the real danger to our good health, the weapon that is being used to drive us towards our rulers' desired (and stated) goals is selected formations and broadcast intensities from the new mobile phone transmitters that have recently been erected above a pavement very close to your home.
  
Every new frequency is equivalent to a new virus. It will be alien to our body and our body will adjust to a new frequency in the normal way ... by getting ill with "influenza". 

The COVID-19 bull**** is an operation. 

Our rulers are pursuing an agenda and they will not stop now.

Something terrible is coming. The recent illness gave many victims 'Hypoxia lite' (their body's haemoglobin could not fully absorb the oxygen they inhaled). The second wave will be way worse than the first. The first was a practice (a " live exercise" as Pompeo called it). Illness, war, financial collapse, famine ... anything is possible ... but, whatever happens, expect it to be bad.

... we will soon endure the darkest hours before a new and wonderful dawn. We have collectively swallowed many barrels of poisonous, Satanic lies. 

However, we must be of good heart for soon we will know the truth and that truth will set the whole world free.



* P.S. The most important book written this century, so far, is surely Arthur Firstenberg's "The Invisible Rainbow" from which most of the information in the above article was taken. 

Every chapter contains breathtaking information (regarding all kinds of issues not mentioned above), information of which everybody should be aware.

Thursday, 16 April 2020

ANTI-MAGIC says WE DO NOT CONSENT

.


The Politicians and median that work to hold us under the spell cast by our (and obviously their) rulers could not deal with any serious scrutiny of the propaganda and nonsense they force into our faces on a daily basis. 
For instance, taking just one issue:


WHY A LOCK-DOWN AT ALL?

... when (1) Sweden, that enforced no lock-down has a COVID outcome so much better than our own



... and (2) when the only genuine investigation into the transmissibility (contagion) of flu, carried out by the US Board of Health between December 1918 and April 1919, found that they could NOT cause a healthy person to become infected by any kind of contact with a person with the 'flu. 

That is, there was NO DEMONSTRABLE CONTAGION TAKING PLACE.

Therefore it is fair for ignoramuses like us to ask searching questions relating to primary assumptions from which government propaganda proceeds. 
Is there anything in the alternative (to virus theory) theory asserted by many, including Rudolf Steiner, at the time of the Spanish Flu that the new installation of radio transmission masts across the world had caused the flu symptoms that had killed so many? Does the super-sensitive neural networks within the human body react to a new electromagnetic frequency (that WILL disturb the motion of electrons in nerve cells) as though it were a threat. Do the body's cells release exosomes to deal with this perceived threat. is the general outcome for the individual the very same as it would be according to virus theory?
i.e. that the body manifests flu symptoms and if this illess does not kill the patient then the body has adjusted successfully to this new virus/frequency and will not be troubled by it again until the virus mutates into something unfamiliar/the body is beset by some new unfamiliar frequency.

Can we see that the two theories are identical in process. It's just that one theory is politically unacceptable because accepting it as true would severely impact technological progress (i.e. Corporate profits). Is it possible that new radiation (5G) is the cause of this "pandemic" (which is not really a pandemic ... it is a live exercise carried out [in preparation for a real pandemic?] according to Mike Pompeo)? 

IT'S ALL BLACK MAGIC, FOLKS

... the purpose of which (at this stage) is for the rulers to gauge exactly how to handle us and gain the full collective compliance they are seeking. A real life-threatening disaster (or a few) is definitely approaching and soon. Politicians lies are nothing new. We should be used to recognising when we are being lied to by now (more or less any time their lips are moving). But many, sadly, do not.

WE NEED TO FIND INSTRUMENTS OF OUR OWN "WHITE MAGIC"

White magic as described has NOTHING TO DO WITH SKIN COLOUR, NATIONALITY or RELIGION. In this video I am suggesting white stick-on paper stickers, circular or rectangular (for addressing envelopes). White is the colour of the spiritual sun. The way our creator often manifests to the spiritual eyes of fortunate human souls. It can signify our loyalty to THE DIVINE, the LOGOS within us.

Place these stickers on your lapel, on COVID-19 posters in shops, on the street, anywhere you think appropriate. Write short pithy mottos on those stickers as you please, if you please. we will recognise one another. We will cast our own collective spell. The message of that spell.

WE DO NOT CONSENT

 WILL NOT CONSENT

No need for mottos at all. The white label will be understood if numbers start doing this. My own short mottos written on address labels, if i bothered to use mottos, might include:

Investigate 5G
5G = Flu
YouTube 5G Barry Trower
Lockdown KILLS!
World Economy killed by COVID19
MPs Killed the UK Economy
Media. ONE LYING MIND
No Vaccinations
No Slavery
No Immune Certificates
No Leper Phone Apps ... and so on.




.



Sunday, 12 April 2020

The Coronavirus Bill 2020: A FEW BEAUTIES

.


The following article is not the result of any kind of forensic examination of the full Coronavirus Bill 2020, a document that signals the end of all that was good and welcome in societies (everywhere). Those who understand what is going on have better things to do with their time than trudge through this muck. It is, rather, a few short observations relating to pages chosen partly at random from the document. Who knows what further delights there are to uncover within a template for tyranny? 
Readers will have to access the full document online and go to referenced pages to examine further meaning and context relating to these extracts.

From page 269 (enforcement):

41 (1) Compliance with a direction issued under this Part of this Schedule may be enforced by— (a) a constable; (b) any other person, or description of person, designated in writing for the purpose of this paragraph by the Executive Office. (2) In exercising the power of enforcement conferred by sub-paragraph (1), a person may— (a) enter any premises; (b) if necessary, use reasonable force

This means the government can appoint anyone they like to come round your house, force entry and haul you away. "description of a person" means any gang the named person decides to take along with him/her.

Next, on same page:

Offences 42 (1) A person commits an offence if the person fails without reasonable excuse to comply with a prohibition, requirement or restriction imposed on the person by a direction issued under this Part of this Schedule. 
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this paragraph is liable— 
(a) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £100,000
(b) on conviction on indictment, to a fine. 

This amounts to a power to confiscate your home if you do not obey. (the taking of all property back under state control is one of the central elements in the UN's "Agenda 2030" document)

Page 217 (POWERS RELATING TO POTENTIALLY INFECTIOUS PERSONS IN ENGLAND):

Powers to direct or remove persons to a place suitable for screening and assessment 6 (1) This paragraph applies if, during a transmission control period, a public health officer has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person in England is potentially infectious.  
(2) The public health officer may, subject to sub-paragraph 
(3)— (a) direct the person to go immediately to a place specified in the direction which is suitable for screening and assessment, 
(b) remove the person to a place suitable for screening and assessment, or 
(c) request a constable to remove the person to a place suitable for screening and assessment (and the constable may then do so). 

Can you recognise the horrendous potential for totalitarian abuse and crimes against persons that the state has granted to itself by these lines?

Pg 221:

(2) A public health officer may at any time during the transmission control period impose such requirements and restrictions on the person as the officer considers necessary and proportionate— 
(a) in the interests of the person, 
b) for the protection of other people, or 
(c) for the maintenance of public health. (
3) Requirements under this paragraph may include requirements— 
(a) to provide information to the public health officer or any specified person; 
(b) to provide details by which the person may be contacted during a specified period; (c) to go for the purposes of further screening and assessment to a specified place suitable for those purposes and do anything that may be required under paragraph 10(1); 
(d) to remain at a specified place (which may be a place suitable for screening and assessment) for a specified period; 
(e) to remain at a specified place in isolation from others for a specified period. 

The slithering use of the word "MAY" translates as "we can do whatever we like. There IS NO LAW."

page 90 (Applications for compulsory admission to hospital for assessment or treatment)

3 (1) An application by an approved mental health professional under section 2 or 3 made during a period for which this paragraph has effect may be founded on a recommendation by a single registered medical practitioner (a “single recommendation”), if the professional considers that compliance with the requirement under that section for the recommendations of two practitioners is impractical or would involve undesirable delay
and ... Pg 91 (Period of remand to hospital) 
5 Sections 35(7) (period of remand to hospital for report on mental condition) and 36(6) (period of remand to hospital for treatment) have effect as if the words “or for more than 12 weeks in all” were omitted. 

This means that one person's opinion (with no second opinion required) can get you locked up permanently in a mental health facility. Soviet KGB methods have been adopted by the TORY PARTY. Great, isn't it?

Pg 129 (Signing of certificates of cause of death):

 23 (1) This paragraph applies if— 
(a) a person dies as a result of any natural illness, 
(b) the person was treated by a registered medical practitioner (“A”) within 28 days prior to the date of the person’s death, 
(c) the time when (apart from this paragraph) A would be required to sign the certificate of cause of death under Article 25(2) falls within any period for which this paragraph has effect, 
(d) at that time, A is unable to sign the certificate or it is impracticable for A to do so, and 
(e) another registered medical practitioner (“B”) can state to the best of B’s knowledge and belief the cause of death. (2) B may sign the certificate of cause of death under Article 25(2). (3) B is subject to the other duties applicable to a person who has signed such a certificate. (4) A is not subject to any duties in relation to such a certificate. 24 (1) This paragraph applies if— 
(a) a person dies as a result of any natural illness,
(b) the person was not treated by a registered medical practitioner within 28 days prior to the date of the person’s death, and 
(c) a registered medical practitioner (“C”) can state to the best of C’s knowledge and belief the cause of death. (2) C may sign the certificate of cause of death under Article 25(2). (3) C is subject to the other duties applicable to a person who has signed such a certificate. 25 Where B or C proposes to sign a certificate under Article 25(2) in reliance on paragraph 23 or 24, Form 12 has effect as if— (a) the two lines beginning with “Date on which was last seen alive and treated by me” were omitted,

Notice how responsibility for reporting accurately on a cause of death has slipped from 'person A' (a doctor who attended the patient prior to that patient's death) to persons "B" and even "C". This is a mechanism that allows doctors to shrug their shoulders and evade taking responsibility for statements about the deaths of patients they have treated and for the manipulation of statistical attributions appointed to those deaths. These pages are a liar's charter.

CBP-8860.pdf:

It is clear from this government document (search using above link) that no second opinion (or even first opinion [given by person "A" above]) is required when attributing cause during this COVID-19 crisis. No autopsy required to establish cause of death. No. Nothing. 

Just about all natural rights have been taken from us and will only be restored after we consent, via vaccination and tracking. Then we will again be living under what our rulers will tell us is FREEDOM.
They are liars.
We will be slaves. Real slaves. Trapped. Helpless. 
We will (if you believe the documents and occult messages released by our "masters of discourse", the Luciferian elite) be sitting around waiting to be culled. 

Why do people not START to take these people (if people in any normal sense of the word they be) at their own word? 

Because we really, really should.


.

Monday, 30 March 2020

STOP IT NOW

...


By our collective acceptance of the ongoing extreme measures being imposed on us, for our own safety and well-being (as usual), we are definitely creating a major health crisis way beyond anything the nebulous Corona Virus can possibly do to us.

 This is the very obvious issue that we need to drive in our politicians' faces RIGHT NOW. 

If we don't we could (again, obviously) end up being culpable accessories to a process of terrible destruction. 

When societies collapse death ensues, sometimes on an unthinkable scale.

The health angle, not the political one, is the route for challenging the ongoing imposed "solution". 

Know it or not, we are currently all involved in a war that is not just about our own survival. 

It is a real war that must be won and we are the only people who can do it. 

In one sense, politicians are kind of irrelevant. 

They are like us but moreso. Real sheep. 

However, they are the only useful and visible target in front of us. 

We must make them more afraid of the possible consequences of betraying us than they are of failing to serve their invisible masters.




P.S.
The following is a MUST-WATCH Interview. Truly ... the information gets increasing gripping as the interview progresses.


DR JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS: C. F. REHNBORG PROFESSOR IN DISEASE PREVENTION IN THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE, OF HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY (EPIDEMIOLOGY) AND BY COURTESY, OF STATISTICS AND OF BIOMEDICAL DATA SCIENCE Medicine - Stanford Prevention Research Center This man is not on mainstream media chosen for his mainstream politically-approved view. He is warning that the data on the illness, potentially very dangerous to the elderly, is uncertain in almost every detail. He explains possible explanations for the very unusual events being reported from Italy. he also also says that a wrong or panicked reaction could threaten the physical and mental health and even the lives of billions of people. Common sense tells us all that this is true. What happens when an economy is collapsed? When people have no jobs and little purpose? When the the only businesses left standing are international corporations acting under the direction of a central bank? When the food inevitably becomes scarce or worse? When we start fighting amongst ourselves about what has been going on? When minds start to collapse and rage takes over? What kind of cure is at least a thousand times worse than the sickness it claims to be trying to cure? What kind of leaders will do this to their own people? What kind of people will stand for it when they realise the mortal danger in which EVERYBODY is being placed?

Friday, 20 March 2020

THE MAN-MADE CLIMATE CRISIS AND AN A4 SHEET OF PAPER

.

IF YOU ARE A CLIMATE-CRISIS (or ER) SKEPTIC THIS IS FOR YOU... AN INSTRUMENT YOU CAN USE TO CHALLENGE YOUR TEACHER OR ANYONE ELSE. LET'S FIND OUT IF 'COMMON SENSE' IS REALLY AS COMMON AS THE LABEL IMPLIES.
An A4 sheet of paper is 290 mm x 210 mm. Area = 290 x 210 = 62, 370 mm^2

It is agreed by all parties that CO2 constitutes 0.04% of the total atmosphere.
0.04% = 0.04/100 = 0.0004 or 1/2500 th of the total atmosphere

Approximating the A4 page area 62,370 mm^2 to 62, 500 mm^2 (accurate to within 130/62,370 = 1 part in 480 or about 0.2%

1/2500 of 62500 = 25  Therefore the TOTAL CO2 in the earth's atmosphere can be proportionately represented by a (5 x 5) mm square drawn on the blank page.

Of this total, it is agreed that the Anthropogenic contribution amounts to between 3% and 5% of that total. Taking the middle figure of 4% ...

4% of 25 is 1 (ONE) . Therefore the total human contribution of CO2 as a proportion of the earth's atmosphere can be fairly represented as a ONE MM SQUARE on the page of A4.

It is really scary to think that if we don't change almost everything about our way of life we might all be dead in 12 years time.

An A4 sheet of paper is 290 mm x 210 mm. Area = 290 x 210 = 62, 370 mm^2

It is agreed by all parties that CO2 constitutes 0.04% of the total atmosphere.
0.04% = 0.04/100 = 0.0004 or 1/2500 th of the total atmosphere

Approximating 62,370 mm^2 to 62, 500 mm^2 (accurate to within 130/62,370 = 1 part in 480 or about 0.2%

1/2500 of 62500 = 25  Therefore the TOTAL CO2 in the earth's atmosphere can be proportionately represented by a (5 x 5) mm square drawn on the blank page.

Of this total, it is agreed that the Anthropogenic contribution amounts to between 3% and 5% of that total. Taking the middle figure of 4% ...

4% of 25 is 1 (ONE) . Therefore the total human contribution of CO2 as a proportion of the earth's atmosphere can be fairly represented as a ONE MM SQUARE on the page.

It is, indeed, really scary to think that if we don't deal with this tiny volume of CO2 by changing almost everything about our way of life, we might all be dead in 12 years!

Perhaps we should start to call this THE SQUARE MILLIMETRE OF DEATH!! 

Oh, hang on. Everything that lives on the earth depends on this gas to flourish and grow.

And this 1 part in 62,500 is the total human contribution. The UK is estimated to produce about 520/30400 =0.017 of total, i.e. less than 2% of total.
... using data from here:

What would our contribution (a dot of size 0.02 mm^2. i.e. 0.1 mm x 0.2mm) look like on this piece of paper? As a fraction, the UK's CO2 contribution is about ONE part in THREE MILLION of the total atmosphere. Would our eyes even find the dot that represents this relative quantity on the page?

We must urgently contact a scientist we can trust and ask the following question: " Is this CO2 gas benign or is it fatal?"

Because it appears to common sensibilities that what is very, very scary is, in this case, not even a tiny bit rational ... from the perspective of quantity (miniscule) or quality (it is very benign).

Professor David Bellamy insisted exactly this ... that CO2 was benign and that the Climate Crisis/Global Warming panic was fraudulent, politically-driven bollox. 

The BBC sacked him.

.