QUESTION FOR THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: WHY DO WESTERN NARRATIVES RELATING TO WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL?

.


Let's keep it simple.

Question One: WHY DO WESTERN NARRATIVES RELATING TO WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL?

The enemy is 'extremist Islamic terrorists'. Right?
These people carried out the 9/11 attacks and all subsequent terrorist atrocities since 2001 across the UK, mainland Europe and the USA.
So why is it an absolute priority for western allies to destroy Middle Eastern governments that oppose, contain and suppress Islamic extremists in their own countries?

Let's repeat that.

Question Two: WHY IS THE WEST DESTROYING SECULAR GOVERNMENTS ACROSS THE MIDDLE EAST WHEN THESE GOVERNMENTS ARE OUR (DECLARED) ENEMIES' ENEMY?

This policy makes no sense at all.

Question Three: IN WHAT WAY DO ORDINARY AMERICANS, BRITISH, OTHER EUROPEAN PEOPLE BENEFIT FROM WAGING THESE WARS?

Help me. I'm struggling here. Are they making us, umm, safer ... for instance?

The ongoing destruction of secular middle Eastern regimes looks increasingly like evil and vicious war-mongering that is doing nothing other than destroying millions of lives and creating a massive potential for more of the very 'terrorism' we claim we are trying to prevent.

So, if these wars are impoverishing, physically endangering and otherwise harming western societies as well as the regimes under attack ....

Question Four: FOR WHOSE BENEFIT ARE THEY BEING WAGED?

Superficially, It would appear that we are attacking perceived threats to Israel. The Yinon plan, the destruction of the countries surrounding Israel by breaking them up into unstable, powerless, tiny statelets is unfolding before our eyes in Iraq and now Syria. But there is much more to it than this.

How, in the long run, can it be good for the people of Israel to inhabit a country that is universally loathed by all its neighbours?

And increasingly loathed by the peoples that sponsor and fight wars for its benefit (that's us, folks. We are not entirely stupid)?

The fact that OUR governments are instrumental in all this self-harming wickedness and that whoever's interests they serve, it ain't ours raises another obvious question.

Question Five: IS THE ENTIRE WESTERN WORLD A COLONY OF AN OCCUPYING POWER?

Many, including Henry Ford, have made this assertion from times long before the creation of the state of Israel. So, in a sense, Israel is not directly the point. Israel (and Zionism) are merely instruments created in service of the long-term goals of the occupier, whose aim has always been total control over humanity under a single world-government.

This has long been the project of what Ford called "The International Jew", that coalition of usurious banking institutions and supremacist gentile-hating Talmudist Rabbis that really do, quite obviously, dominate our western (and increasingly, global) political culture.

Interestingly, these are the same two major parties that Christ opposed during His Ministry.

Christ drove the moneychangers from the Temple and condemned the Pharissees (that founded Orthodox Judaism) as being "Liars! Of Satan!"

How little has changed.

It is amazing how this Satanic conspiracy has managed to seduce so many millions of submissive gentiles into co-operating with their plan (and our own destruction).

Furthermore, we surely know that self-sufficiency is the reasonable goal of any individual, any family, any community, any nation. Yet we have allowed the 'globalists' to cast such beneficial self-serving thoughts aside and to make us fall in with the idea of the separation of productive functions across countries and even continents in such a manner that we all become entirely dependent on the financial class that mediate between the separated functions they have created.

We must be mad.

Order-following careerists, as always, are the instruments that deliver our tragedy.

Question Six: HOW DO WE RID OURSELVES OF OUR DIABOLICAL MASTERS?

The tide is turning. Keep asking the simple questions.

Demand that media liars answer them.

Ask: WHY DO WESTERN NARRATIVES RELATING TO WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL?

Ask: WHY DOES THE FUNDAMENTAL PREMISE OF GLOBALISM, THAT WE ABANDON THE IDEA OF SELF-SUFFICIENCY MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL?

Ask: WHY DO ALL WESTERN COUNTRIES PARTICIPATE IN WARS THAT HARM OUR OWN INTERESTS?

Ask: DOES OUR PROSECUTION OF WARS AGAINST PERCEIVED THREATS TO ISRAEL DEMONSTRATE THAT OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE ALL INSTRUMENTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIERS THAT DEMADED ITS CREATION.

Ask: DURING ITS AGE OF EMPIRE 100 THOUSAND BRITS ( INCLUDING LOCAL EMPLOYEES) CONTROLLED 300 MILLION INDIANS. IS THE WESTERN WORLD SIMILARLY COLONISED BY A NUMERICALLY TINY ALIEN ELITE?


.

The True Racism That Destroys

Here is the latest from the Saatchi and Saatchi advertising agency. It typifies all voters who want Britain to leave the European Union as the kind of nasty thug that we used to see fighting in football grounds and smashing up the surrounding neighborhood for fun. The thug is threatening the kind of nice little old Indian lady that almost nobody has a problem liking. The messages are clear.

If you Vote to Leave you're one of THEM.

If you are an immigrant vote to remain or give THIS guy power over your life.

I will vote Brexit primarily because international finance (and their instruments; the leaders of every government, financial institution and mainstream media outlet) want us to stay in the EU. They want all their sheep in a single tent. That's the game. That's the goal. Everybody paying attention knows it. The sheep are waking up and most don't like what they see one little bit. They see the future planned for them and want something very different.

We're not sure what we do want but we DON'T WANT THAT.

However, it's going to be tough escaping the matrix because all the institutional and media power is held securely (for now) in the same clammy hands.

The thing that is making people mad about this advert, though, is the racist slur directed against the ordinary Englishman**.

And yet ... and yet ...

The truth is that the we ARE a racist country ... but to mention the genuine racism that blights the western world, including the UK, is to commit THE GREAT HERESY. There is a reason for the government and media war against racism, after all.

That reason must never be stated. The TABOO must be enforced.

THE TRUE RACISM THAT DESTROYS

Saatchi and Saatchi is a Jewish company that came to prominence as Thatcher's "Britain Isn't Working" propagandist.
Charles Saatchi is primarily responsible for the increasing degeneracy of British Art over the past few decades. Saatchi is the Culturally Marxist (International Jewish) agenda in action.

The world's largest advertising group (WPP), based in London, is led by Sir Martin Sorrell who is Jewish.
British TV, including the state broadcaster, the BBC operates under massively disproportionate Jewish influence.
The UK's largest independent radio broadcaster is Global Radio whose Founder and Executive President is Ashley Tabor (Jewish).
Hollywood is completely controlled by Jews according to the LA Times.
The banking industry, publishing, the major Supermarkets (Tesco, Sainsbury's), clothes retailers (Marks & Spencer's, BHS [now defunct] etc., etc. yadda, yadda, yadda ...
John Lennon famously said that "show business is an extension of the Jewish religion." Video here (with audio track very recently muted ... wonder how that happened?)

anyway, because it is tiresome making these points, the truth can be stated in a nutshell....

.... that there is not ANY major part of British public life that is not overseen and dominated by Jewish money.

This, in itself, would not matter greatly if the issue was simply who is rich and who is not. Great wealth in itself, though perhaps a spiritual liability, is no crime.

However, the issue that does need to be raised out loud is:

How can one tiny group within a population come to exercise such domination over a society without behaving with extreme prejudice IN FAVOUR OF THEMSELVES and AGAINST ALL OTHER RACIAL GROUPS? 

Is not the behaviour that created this domination the very definition of RACISM?

Small wonder then that we can look back at recent history and discover that the people who promoted the idea of anti-racist laws (and much more besides) were, almost without exception, Marxist Jews. Was not the PRIMARY purpose of this anti-racist legislation, quite clearly, to create a safe environment for themselves from within which they could attack, undermine and take over leadership of gentile societies?

It's a NO BRAINER ... THE REAL RACISM THAT IS DESTROYING OUR SOCIETIES IS JEWISH RACISM.

The white skinhead in the advert is a sad figure for whom we should feel some pity. Many of his complaints are justified and should be taken seriously. He has been betrayed by his "representatives" and he knows it. We have all been betrayed but the working classes are the ones who have suffered most from the export of manufacturing industries, the wage depression caused by mass-immigration and the shocking inflation of property prices and rents over the past few years. He is the biggest victim in this society and he is the one we are encouraged to hate and applauded for hating.

Of course the media and political class are entirely focused on another "victim" class (who have not suffered in this society but, rather, tended to benefit disproportionately when benefits were available). Hating these victims.... umm, sorry ... questioning any aspect of their culture or making reference to their collective dominance DEFINES US AS EVIL NAZIS. If we "go there" we obviously LOVE HITLER.

Ordinary Jewish people have been suckered into supporting their elite; into acting as a shield for their activities by the imposition on the gentile world of a guilt complex for the great crimes committed against 'the Jewish People' in WW2. The great defining horror of which provably never happened.
David Irving was, like most truth-tellers, naive when he imagined that the British High Court, a Jewish closed shop, would allow him to overturn this greatest of ESTABLISHMENT lies.

Our entire reality beggars belief, but there we are.

Perhaps the forces of hell have something to do with all this?

Here's hoping that Jews will recognise the warnings of Christ against their leaders ("of Satan!" "Liars") and His actions against the money-changers of his day (He drove them from the temple with a whip of knotted cords). If ordinary Jews, propagandised into a state of servile idiocy like most of the rest of us, can recognise the truth about their own leaders and reject them, there is hope for us all.

Some already have, of course ... Gilad Atzmon, Israel Shamir and many others.

As one Jewish Holocaust Denier, and true friend of his own people said to me, "I really hope Jews get it soon.  Not everybody who wakes up to the truth about this will be nice people like us."


PS (Ref above)
** My own father was an Irish immigrant who came to London after WW2 when there was massive reconstruction going on in the country. He told me he was often lost in admiration at the 'fair-mindedness' and decency of the ordinary Englishman. He said that sometimes at the end of a job when workers were being selected for some new project elsewhere, all the men would stand before management and their names would be called out for the new work. The companies would pick the fittest and strongest, often young men like himself leaving the 'old boys' (who had fought in the war for King and Country) as rejects, jobless.
He said, "They'd say to me "Good Luck Pat". I felt guilty, struggled to look them in the eye. They were good people. I can tell you that if the same thing happened in Dublin, Irishmen wouldn't take that treatment with anything like the same good grace."
I worked for myself as an electrician for 20 years. Without over-generalising, the working class Englishman was easily my favorite client. Fair, straightforward, no problems. It is painful to have watched a whole class being so betrayed by those supposedly representing them.

The primary victim in English society over the past 70 years is the ordinary Englishman. Without a doubt.


.


.

Perfect

Ex- leader of the Greater London Council and (more recently) Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone has been suspended from the Labour Party for stating a TRUE (if little-known) historical fact relating to Israel and Hitler.

There are two possible reasons for this mind-boggling development:
1) The Labour Party has become insane under the Jewish onslaught wreaked upon it over the past few weeks (the objective of which is getting Jeremy Corbyn removed as Party leader),

Or

2) The Labour Party has had enough of infernal bullying and lapdog media pressure and have decided to do something stupid in order to highlight the ridiculous nature of the continuous charges of 'anti-Semitism' levelled against them. (After all, as Gilad Atzmon says, they could hardly have sold out to Jewish pressure more abjectly) ... But, it appears that for this lobby submission must be total and the necessary consequence of criticism of Israel must be public humiliation, loss of career or both.

Livingstone said that Hitler was a Zionist before he "went mad" (i.e. started shoving millions of Jews into human gas chambers); that he did a deal with International Zionism in 1933 to transfer German Jews to Israel. This is true and well documented. The Haavara agreement is described on Wikipedia (definitely not an anti-Semitic site) here.
It will be interesting to see how the Labour Party and the media deal with this issue in the public domain and what spin they will try to put on Hitler's 'Zionism'. My guess is that it will soon be declared that Livingstone's conflation of Zionism and "Hitler" had little to do with his suspension, thus putting aside the need to mention this issue ever again.
On the bright side, if this shocker does get a genuine public airing, here's hoping we can all move along to discussion of Livingstone's other reference, Hitler's 'madness' ... then, at long last, we might get fair debate in public (excuse the joke) relating to those dreadful human gas chambers in Auschwitz.
You know .... the ones that absolutely provably never existed.

Frank Lowy, Westfield and Croydon

.

The founder and owner of Westfield, Frank Lowy, was a Haganah fighter (terrorist), one of those who killed hundreds of Palestinian civilians and unarmed soldiers (according to Wikipedia) during the 1948 Palestine War when the masses of Palestinians were driven out of the country. 

Once Israel was stolen he left Israel (for 9 months of every year) and went into the property business in Australia. 

FIFTY DAYS before 9/11 he and Larry Silverstein bought the World Trade Centre in New York (how unlucky was that?) at a time when there was a requirement for massively expensive renovation and asbestos removal from the buildings:

'To maintain the trade center as class-A office space commanding top rents, the [Port Authority] would have had to spend $800 million rebuilding the electrical, electronic communication, and cooling systems.' The removal of asbestos raised this figure to well in excess of $1 billion.

Lowy and Silverstein double-insured the WTC for multiple terrorist attacks (meaning they could claim for the same damage twice if two planes or attacks were involved) and collected $4.577 billion for WTC's 1, 2, 4 and 5 and $861 million for WTC7. Total $ 5,438,000,000

This man is obviously a business genius ... or something.

What is very difficult to stand is that the centre of Croydon is being demolished to make way for a new Westfield Centre. So my town centre is going to be owned by someone who obviously (putting it kindly) should be in jail, someone deeply involved in the murder of 3000 New Yorkers on 9/11 and who knows what else?

What kind of sheep are we?

I have it on good authority from somebody who works inside the organisation that Westfield operates a "Jewish glass ceiling". There is a level of management beyond which a gentile cannot ascend.

"They have a couple of token non-Jewish goons they wheel out to create a different impression but everyone inside the Company knows how it works."

Lowy is obviously very close to the heart of the British (and International) establishment. This is the kind of squillionaire who funds the think-tanks that set out and enforce the anti-racist, multi-cultural, tolerant, secular agenda on our culture.

It is obvious that this man has no genuine interest in such principles, other than in the fact their imposition serves to divide-and-rule and further the interests of the globalist banking oligarchy that owns our governments. 

The societal impartiality promoted by our leaders is as genuine as Westfield anti-racism and Israeli multi-culturalism.

Fake morality as an instrument for the imposition of centralised tyranny describes Communism in a nutshell.

Westfield and the rest of their corporate/banking pals ARE government.

The terrible thing is that this is our collective reality.

The good thing is that they can't hide it any more.

The truth is out and THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE.

The Parasite That Owns This Country Hates The NHS

..


So, Oliver Letwin wrote a 'blueprint' for NHS privatisation in 1988. 

British citizens should remember that ‘British Rail was systematically run down, a standard privatisation strategy, for some years before it was sold off. This makes the policy easier to sell to the public because the transfer of public assets into private hands can be represented as an improvement in the service.

Letwin's "Privatising The World" recommended this key step in the process and it looks like the assault against the NHS is being seriously ramped up by the privateers at the moment via the Junior Doctors dispute.

Already 2 out of 3 NHS contracts are being won by private health firms, but for the money- parasites this will never be enough. Neither will the interest paid on the billions "borrowed" by the government to fund the service.

No.

The NHS is a sore on the body of the City of London. The predatory parasites whose success at running money rackets makes them our real masters groan in agony when they think of the money they could be making out of UK health care if it was run along American lines.

Why, with interest rates so low, the NHS is nearly run at cost (apart from the monstrous PFI debts that the Blair government incurred on our behalf). The limited nature of the parasitism is INTOLERABLE to certain parties, though our greatest blessing as British citizens. 

In fact, the money-lending class can tolerate no activity from which they cannot extract a substantial rake-off. We allow them to create money out of nothing and charge us interest on this money, that they never had in the first place (the debts owned by banks to each other are greater than those owed by nations, and every bit as unpayable). 

The money-lending scam  is simply a war against the masses waged by the ultra-rich (and the privatisation agenda and TTIP trade deals are merely a part of the same process). 

Such is the power of these fiends that this scam, this fundamental of nearly all societies is never questioned in schools, universities or even (maybe, particularly) in Schools of Economics. The power and scope of these forces of enslavement is breathtaking and mind-boggling.

 The system cannot possibly last. It must collapse ... but we must be ready to oppose ANY system these same parasites have ready and waiting to replace the old one.

God bless the Junior Doctors. They are fighting for the survival of the NHS and they are fighting for us.

PARIS 2015 and BOLOGNA 1980. ANY SIMILARITIES ?

.


Remember when the European Parliament condemned its own Intelligence Services for murdering 85 Italian citizens (on Bologna Railway Station in order to prevent a Communist government being elected in Italy)?

Simple observations:

The danger to the establishment that the Bologna outrage defused was the high likelihood that the Communist Party would win the upcoming Italian election. The 'Red Brigade', left-wing 'extremists', were blamed for the crime and that was that. Danger passed.

The danger to 'the establishment' that the Paris attacks will work to counteract is

1) Marie Le Pen's National Front (leading the polls in France), 

2) UKIP in the UK (currently polls say 50+% of Brits will vote to exit the EU in the coming 2017 European Referendum.

......and the threat from various other similar parties across Europe. This event provides a pretext for radical reform (the shutting down of borders and the like) that will probably defuse the rising anti-European sentiment and save the despised UE......never mind breathe life into renewed NATO mlitary action against Syria.

Simple questions:

1) What good do events like the Paris attacks do ISIS? This is a great mystery. 

2) Why would an organisation without air defences provide the perfect pretext to its enemies by crying out "BOMB ME PLEASE"? It makes no sense whatever.

3) Why would committed warriors UNNECESSARILY die on the job when they could just as easily slaughter large numbers of defenseless people and creep away to repeat the exercise later in some other place.

Anyone paying attention knows that the state-sponsored terror that was once openly condemned by the European Parliament has become the central art-form and political driver of the 21st Century historical narrative. 

It is worth reading the European Parliament's1990 resolution on this issue (below). 
This pronouncement was a follow-up to an investigation by Italian authorities into the Bologna train station massacre in which 80 Italian commuters died......

.....murdered, the OFFICIAL investigation 

later revealed, by NATO Intelligence 

Services, our supposed 'protectors'.

Europeans should read this and weep. 

Where are those who would intend to so defend or even ask tough questions on behalf of the European peoples today?

We know that nothing useful resulted from this resolution but our system and its placemen and women appear to have lost even the intention to do the right thing.

European Parliament resolution on Gladio  (1990)

On November 22, 1990, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Operation Gladio.

Source : http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:JOC_1990_324_R_0186_01&from=EN
(the Gladio resolution begins on page 201).

Joint resolution replacing B3-2021, 2058, 2068, 2078 and 2087/90

A. having regard to the revelation by several European governments of the existence for 40 years of a clandestine parallel intelligence and armed operations organization in several Member States of the Community,

B. whereas for over 40 years this organization has escaped all democratic controls and has been run by the secret services of the states concerned in collaboration with NATO,

C. fearing the danger that such clandestine network may have interfered illegally in the internal political affairs of Member States or may still do so,

D. whereas in certain Member States military secret services (or uncontrolled branches thereof) were involved in serious cases of terrorism and crime as evidenced by, various judicial inquiries,

E. whereas these organizations operated and continue to operate completely outside the law since they are not subject to any parliamentary control and frequently those holding the highest government and constitutional posts are kept in the dark as to these matters,

F. whereas the various 'Gladio' organizations have at their disposal independent arsenals and military ressources which give them an unknown strike potential, thereby jeopardizing the democratic structures of the countries in which they are operating or have been operating,

G. greatly concerned at the existence of decision-making and operational bodies which are not subject to any form of democratic control and are of a completely clandestine nature at a time when greater Community cooperation in the field of security is a constant subject of discussion,

THE EU PARLIAMENT

1. Condemns the clandestine creation of manipulative and operational networks and Calls for a full investigation into the nature, structure, aims and all other aspects of these clandestine organizations or any splinter groups, their use for illegal interference in the internal political affairs of the countries concerned, the problem of terrorism in Europe and the possible collusion of the secret services of Member States or third countries;

2. Protests vigorously at the assumption by certain US military personnel at SHAPE and in NATO of the right to encourage the establishment in Europe of a clandestine intelligence and operation network;

3. Calls on the governments of the Member States to dismantle all clandestine military and paramilitary networks;

4. Calls on the judiciaries of the countries in which the presence of such military organizations has been ascertained to elucidate fully their composition and modus operandi and to clarify any action they may have taken to destabilize the democratic structure of the Member States;

5. Requests all the Member States to take the necessary measures, if necessary by establishing parliamentary committees of inquiry, to draw up a complete list of organizations active in this field, and at the same time to monitor their links with the respective state intelligence services and their links, if any, with terrorist action groups and/or other illegal practices;

6. Calls on the Council of Ministers to provide full information on the activities of these secret intelligence and operational services;

7. Calls on its competent committee to consider holding a hearing in order to clarify the role and impact of the 'Gladio' organization and any similar bodies;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Secretary-General of NATO, the governments of the Member States and the United States Government."

.

IN OLDEN DAYS WHEN ELECTED POLITICIANS HAD GOOD INTENTIONS

.

Anyone paying attention knows that the state-sponsored terror that was once openly condemned by the European Parliament has become the central art-form and political driver of the 21st Century historical narrative. 

It is worth reading the European Parliament's 1990 resolution on this issue (below). This pronouncement was a follow-up to an investigation by Italian authorities into the Bologna train station massacre in which 80 Italian commuters died.....murdered, the official investigation later revealed, by NATO Intelligence services, our supposed 'protectors'.

Europeans should read this and weep. 

Where are those who would intend to so defend the European peoples today?

We know that nothing useful resulted from this resolution but our system and its placemen and women appear to have lost even the intention to do the right thing.

European Parliament resolution on Gladio  (1990)

On November 22, 1990, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Operation Gladio.

Source : http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:JOC_1990_324_R_0186_01&from=EN
(the Gladio resolution begins on page 201).

Joint resolution replacing B3-2021, 2058, 2068, 2078 and 2087/90

A. having regard to the revelation by several European governments of the existence for 40 years of a clandestine parallel intelligence and armed operations organization in several Member States of the Community,

B. whereas for over 40 years this organization has escaped all democratic controls and has been run by the secret services of the states concerned in collaboration with NATO,

C. fearing the danger that such clandestine network may have interfered illegally in the internal political affairs of Member States or may still do so,

D. whereas in certain Member States military secret services (or uncontrolled branches thereof) were involved in serious cases of terrorism and crime as evidenced by, various judicial inquiries,

E. whereas these organizations operated and continue to operate completely outside the law since they are not subject to any parliamentary control and frequently those holding the highest government and constitutional posts are kept in the dark as to these matters,

F. whereas the various 'Gladio' organizations have at their disposal independent arsenals and military ressources which give them an unknown strike potential, thereby jeopardizing the democratic structures of the countries in which they are operating or have been operating,

G. greatly concerned at the existence of decision-making and operational bodies which are not subject to any form of democratic control and are of a completely clandestine nature at a time when greater Community cooperation in the field of security is a constant subject of discussion,

THE EU PARLIAMENT

1. Condemns the clandestine creation of manipulative and operational networks and Calls for a full investigation into the nature, structure, aims and all other aspects of these clandestine organizations or any splinter groups, their use for illegal interference in the internal political affairs of the countries concerned, the problem of terrorism in Europe and the possible collusion of the secret services of Member States or third countries;

2. Protests vigorously at the assumption by certain US military personnel at SHAPE and in NATO of the right to encourage the establishment in Europe of a clandestine intelligence and operation network;

3. Calls on the governments of the Member States to dismantle all clandestine military and paramilitary networks;

4. Calls on the judiciaries of the countries in which the presence of such military organizations has been ascertained to elucidate fully their composition and modus operandi and to clarify any action they may have taken to destabilize the democratic structure of the Member States;

5. Requests all the Member States to take the necessary measures, if necessary by establishing parliamentary committees of inquiry, to draw up a complete list of organizations active in this field, and at the same time to monitor their links with the respective state intelligence services and their links, if any, with terrorist action groups and/or other illegal practices;

6. Calls on the Council of Ministers to provide full information on the activities of these secret intelligence and operational services;

7. Calls on its competent committee to consider holding a hearing in order to clarify the role and impact of the 'Gladio' organization and any similar bodies;

8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the Secretary-General of NATO, the governments of the Member States and the United States Government."

.